Power Ratings for 2019. To compare teams, subtract one team’s rating from the other. This will provide an estimated skill difference in points per game.
Power Ratings for 2020. To compare teams, subtract one team’s rating from the other. This will provide an estimated skill difference in points per game.
Rank
Team
Class
Record
Rating
1
Mill Valley
5A
9-2
64.94
2
Wichita Northwest
5A
10-1
64.72
3
Andale
3A
13-0
56.68
4
Derby
6A
9-2
53.96
5
Kapaun Mt. Carmel
5A
8-2
53.26
6
Bishop Carroll
5A
8-3
48.27
7
Olathe North
6A
8-2
45.79
8
Lawrence
6A
9-1
45.68
9
Maize
5A
9-2
45.33
10
Wichita East
6A
7-2
42.90
11
Blue Valley
6A
6-2
42.34
12
St. Thomas Aquinas
5A
6-4
39.95
13
Blue Valley North
6A
7-3
38.01
14
Bishop Miege
4A
5-5
37.53
15
Blue Valley Northwest
6A
5-2
37.27
16
Maize South
5A
5-4
36.18
17
Rossville
2A
13-0
35.94
18
Paola
4A
9-1
35.54
19
Junction City
6A
9-2
35.32
20
Gardner Edgerton
6A
5-3
33.77
21
Shawnee Mission Northwest
6A
6-2
33.17
22
Goddard
5A
7-3
33.02
23
St. James Academy
4A
8-4
32.55
24
Topeka Seaman
5A
7-2
32.44
25
Andover Central
4A
7-2
32.23
26
Tonganoxie
4A
9-2
32.02
27
Perry-Lecompton
3A
11-2
31.96
28
Andover
5A
5-4
31.87
29
Holton
3A
9-2
31.24
30
Wichita Collegiate
3A
10-2
31.20
31
Hutchinson
5A
8-2
30.93
32
Wichita Heights
5A
5-3
29.54
33
Topeka Hayden
3A
7-2
28.88
34
Olathe West
6A
5-4
28.83
35
Silver Lake
2A
6-2
28.32
36
De Soto
5A
8-2
27.65
37
Hays
5A
5-3
26.93
38
Olathe East
6A
6-2
26.91
39
Riley County
3A
8-2
25.86
40
Southeast of Saline
3A
9-1
25.75
41
Blue Valley Southwest
5A
3-5
25.54
42
Valley Center
5A
5-4
24.68
43
Newton
5A
2-7
24.39
44
Manhattan
6A
6-4
23.62
45
Rock Creek
3A
5-3
23.41
46
Nemaha Central
2A
8-3
23.04
47
Clearwater
3A
7-3
22.64
48
Cheney
3A
9-1
21.58
49
Olathe Northwest
6A
3-4
20.89
50
Hoisington
2A
12-1
19.69
51
Centralia
1A
8-2
19.56
52
McPherson
4A
10-2
19.56
53
Goddard Eisenhower
5A
3-6
19.55
54
Kansas City Piper
4A
5-4
19.41
55
Spring Hill
5A
4-4
17.30
56
Arkansas City
4A
6-7
17.20
57
Wichita West
6A
3-4
16.94
58
Lawrence Free State
6A
0-6
16.68
59
Dodge City
6A
4-6
16.64
60
Frontenac
3A
6-5
16.18
61
Olathe South
6A
1-5
15.43
62
Basehor-Linwood
4A
7-4
15.20
63
Burlington
3A
8-2
15.16
64
Lansing
4A
5-4
15.13
65
Blue Valley West
6A
1-5
15.13
66
Buhler
4A
6-4
15.08
67
Olpe
1A
12-0
14.91
68
Halstead
3A
4-5
14.05
69
Garden City
6A
3-6
13.19
70
Louisburg
4A
4-5
12.96
71
Lyndon
1A
9-3
12.55
72
Eudora
4A
3-7
11.99
73
Columbus
3A
8-1
11.59
74
Prairie View
3A
8-2
11.59
75
Salina Central
5A
1-8
11.36
76
Rose Hill
4A
6-4
9.80
77
Washburn Rural
6A
4-6
9.30
78
Leavenworth
5A
4-4
8.86
79
Maur Hill Prep
2A
8-1
8.81
80
Osage City
2A
9-2
7.99
81
Girard
3A
4-6
7.91
82
Campus
6A
1-6
7.85
83
Galena
3A
6-2
7.69
84
Valley Heights
1A
7-2
7.25
85
Beloit
2A
5-6
7.15
86
Inman
1A
8-3
6.56
87
Sabetha
3A
5-4
6.11
88
Marysville
3A
4-5
5.58
89
Pittsburg
5A
4-5
4.89
90
Holcomb
3A
7-2
4.84
91
Hesston
3A
4-5
4.65
92
Shawnee Mission East
6A
1-6
4.42
93
Republic County
2A
4-3
4.28
94
Wamego
4A
6-5
4.21
95
Salina South
5A
2-6
4.11
96
Wichita South
6A
2-5
3.62
97
St. Mary’s-Colgan
2A
7-3
3.21
98
Hutchinson Trinity
2A
8-2
2.14
99
Fort Scott
4A
7-1
2.11
100
Haven
2A
8-3
1.29
101
Smith Center
1A
8-2
1.27
102
Colby
3A
6-3
1.22
103
El Dorado
4A
5-3
0.97
104
Concordia
3A
5-4
0.63
105
Minneapolis
2A
4-5
-0.12
106
Kingman
2A
6-3
-0.34
107
Wellington
4A
3-6
-0.63
108
Shawnee Mission South
6A
0-7
-1.61
109
Scott Community
3A
6-4
-1.98
110
Cimarron
2A
6-4
-2.32
111
Garden Plain
2A
9-2
-2.76
112
Augusta
4A
4-6
-3.32
113
Chapman
3A
4-3
-3.80
114
Jefferson County North
1A
7-3
-3.88
115
Oakley
1A
10-3
-3.96
116
Sedgwick
1A
8-2
-4.32
117
Liberal
5A
2-6
-4.35
118
Emporia
5A
2-7
-4.84
119
Hillsboro
2A
6-4
-5.43
120
Pratt
3A
3-6
-6.04
121
Phillipsburg
2A
4-5
-6.52
122
Clay Center
3A
4-5
-6.72
123
Topeka
6A
1-4
-7.19
124
Conway Springs
1A
8-2
-8.00
125
Caney Valley
3A
6-3
-8.08
126
Chanute
4A
3-4
-8.09
127
Atchison
4A
2-7
-9.04
128
Thomas More Prep-Marian
2A
7-2
-9.63
129
Larned
3A
3-6
-9.67
130
Baldwin
3A
3-5
-10.19
131
Shawnee Mission North
6A
1-5
-10.52
132
Labette County
4A
2-7
-10.99
133
Great Bend
4A
0-7
-11.23
134
Hugoton
3A
4-5
-11.30
135
Riverside
2A
4-5
-11.33
136
Plainville
1A
5-5
-11.98
137
Norton
2A
4-3
-11.98
138
Mission Valley
2A
5-4
-12.26
139
Shawnee Mission West
6A
2-5
-12.26
140
Field Kindley
4A
2-6
-12.53
141
Wellsville
2A
4-5
-13.01
142
Shawnee Heights
5A
1-8
-13.35
143
Winfield
4A
1-8
-14.31
144
Santa Fe Trail
3A
2-7
-14.52
145
Ulysses
4A
3-6
-14.69
146
Anderson County
3A
4-5
-14.90
147
Wichita Southeast
6A
1-6
-15.23
148
Parsons
3A
3-6
-16.29
149
Jackson Heights
1A
4-5
-16.94
150
Riverton
2A
4-4
-17.16
151
Smoky Valley
3A
3-6
-17.53
152
Mulvane
4A
1-7
-17.56
153
Pleasant Ridge
2A
2-5
-17.89
154
Ellsworth
2A
2-6
-17.98
155
Circle
4A
1-6
-18.42
156
St. Marys
2A
3-6
-18.85
157
Belle Plaine
2A
4-5
-18.91
158
Iola
3A
3-4
-19.24
159
Topeka Highland Park
5A
0-3
-19.83
160
Goodland
3A
3-5
-21.22
161
Ottawa
4A
1-8
-21.95
162
Topeka West
5A
1-5
-21.96
163
Wabaunsee
1A
4-6
-22.21
164
Ellis
2A
3-6
-22.93
165
Jefferson West
3A
1-5
-23.01
166
Bonner Springs
4A
1-6
-23.14
167
Hiawatha
3A
3-6
-23.21
168
Wichita Trinity Academy
3A
2-7
-24.27
169
Uniontown
1A
6-5
-24.77
170
Ell-Saline
1A
4-6
-25.23
171
Fredonia
2A
5-4
-25.35
172
Douglass
2A
3-4
-25.81
173
Sterling
2A
2-7
-25.91
174
Eureka
2A
5-4
-27.46
175
Lakin
2A
4-5
-27.78
176
Bishop Ward
3A
2-5
-28.09
177
Independence
4A
1-4
-28.20
178
Nickerson
3A
0-8
-30.24
179
Royal Valley
3A
0-6
-30.35
180
Remington
1A
4-5
-31.36
181
Central Heights
1A
4-5
-32.52
182
Cherryvale
3A
2-7
-32.69
183
Council Grove
3A
2-7
-33.43
184
Atchison County
2A
3-6
-33.88
185
Chaparral
2A
2-6
-34.22
186
Russell
3A
1-8
-35.30
187
Osawatomie
3A
1-8
-36.29
188
Syracuse
2A
4-4
-36.39
189
West Franklin
2A
3-6
-37.90
190
Baxter Springs
3A
0-7
-39.74
191
Humboldt
2A
4-4
-39.76
192
Wichita North
6A
0-7
-40.26
193
Marion
2A
2-7
-41.11
194
McLouth
2A
1-8
-42.23
195
Neodesha
2A
2-7
-42.25
196
Southeast
2A
3-4
-42.39
197
Pleasanton
1A
3-6
-42.92
198
Erie
2A
2-7
-44.27
199
Oskaloosa
2A
0-8
-45.19
200
Troy
1A
2-7
-45.58
201
Abilene
4A
0-6
-49.24
202
Salina Sacred Heart
1A
2-7
-49.69
203
Jayhawk Linn
2A
1-7
-51.28
204
Southwestern Heights
2A
1-8
-52.13
205
Wichita Independent
1A
2-6
-52.52
206
Northeast
1A
1-6
-54.91
207
Lyons
2A
1-6
-54.94
208
Kansas City Turner
5A
0-4
-56.70
209
Elkhart
1A
2-7
-57.09
210
Ellinwood
1A
0-9
-60.27
211
Sublette
1A
1-5
-61.38
212
Northern Heights
1A
1-8
-64.19
213
Horton
1A
0-8
-66.14
214
Stanton County
1A
0-9
-70.85
215
Bluestem
2A
0-9
-81.86
Class
Average Rating
State Champion
Runner-Up
6A
18.02
Derby
Blue Valley North
5A
20.16
Mill Valley
Wichita Northwest
4A
2.19
St. James Academy
Arkansas City
3A
-1.91
Andale
Perry-Lecompton
2A
-17.91
Rossville
Hoisington
1A
-26.74
Olpe
Oakley
Kansas City Harmon (6A), Kansas City Schlagle (5A), Kansas City Sumner (5A), Kansas City Washington (5A), and Kansas City Wyandotte (6A) did not compete this season.
Power Ratings for 2021. To compare teams, subtract one team’s rating from the other. This will provide an estimated skill difference in points per game.
Power Ratings for 2022. To compare teams, subtract one team’s rating from the other. This will provide an estimated skill difference in points per game.
Power Ratings for 2023. To compare teams, subtract one team’s rating from the other. This will provide an estimated skill difference in points per game.
In charting, “Coverage” indicates the level of detail which is covered by the media available for a specific game or season. In order to provide estimates of player value, each play or possession is charted and the Kansas player(s) most responsible for that play occurring is allocated that play (with its inherent value, good or bad) to his ledger. After some math, a value score estimate is provided that can be compared to others of different seasons and positions.
Coverage is an important aspect to this exercise, because with better coverage we have a better estimate of a player’s value score. The theory behind charting is that, simply by keeping a record of which players did “good” or “bad,” we can reasonably rate players for comparison. With more information, this rating gets more accurate.
Specifically, coverage relates to something along the following scale:
TV broadcast – Video Highlights – Radio broadcast – Play-By-Play – Box Score – Message Board Game threads – Newspaper Summary Articles
What’s best is the TV broadcast itself, but short of that there are other supplemental media sources that help determine how to best chart the game. Note some of these work well together. Without a full game broadcast, having video highlights along with the official play-by-play summary is a good source of reconciling possessions using accurate info. But as we go back further in time, less and less of this is available. In some instances, all we have is Box Score data. Effectively, this is a “bare minimum” of coverage.
Like the player value stats themselves, coverage is itself recorded and graded. A score of 100.0% is best with 89.0% being set as the middle and 78.0% being worst. Since 2006, the coverage by season is as follows:
Coverage has been near-perfect since 2019, which was the first season for this project. Every season prior to 2019 was done retroactively, and the Coverage had to be obtained through archival means. As we go back further in time, we see the Coverage score slip lower and lower.
Coverage isn’t exactly at 100% for the recent seasons solely because there are a few plays that the TV coverage didn’t fully capture and/or there are a few games that weren’t caught live and had to be pieced together through an edited highlight video that, while very good, wasn’t exhaustive enough to show each possession for that game. But, effectively this won’t change value scores much.
The Full Video Left column shows the number of games that season that don’t have full video coverage, or a coverage score that is at least 95.7% for that game. Some games have a small segment missing (such as the first 3 minutes), but these are still given the “full video” designation. What this column shows is how many games are still there to be hunted down in order to fully complete this project.
The % Video column indicates the number of plays which are tracked through video. It will tie closely to Coverage. This metric is a good judge of how much more media there is to find for that specific season.
The last column isn’t complete for each season, but it shows which percentage of plays get a Coverage score of 90% or higher. In order to get a coverage score of 90% or higher, the play must be either viewed through video, heard through radio, or be recorded through play-by-play. Certain plays that aren’t available will be all possessions before play-by-play is available (which is most games before 2004), defensive possessions with no video/radio in which there is an opponent make or non-steal turnover, as well as other odd possessions that play-by-play doesn’t give full context to. Before 2006, this number will likely be far lower.
As part of off-season content, Kansas players of seasons past are randomly selected to be featured in a breakdown of their careers. The players who were selected are listed below. Click on the link to discover who they are and how their careers look based upon the numbers.
For the off-season, periodically a random Kansas basketball player will be selected for a deeper statistical look. Since 1994, there have been 172 players who have played in at least one regular season game. The first random player selected was Darrell Arthur. This, the second installation, will feature the following randomly selected player…
Gethro Muscadin
This feature will be melancholy. Gethro passed away in 2022 following a 2021 car accident. He was taken to a hospital after the accident where he spent months being kept alive while apparently being unresponsive. Muscadin played in only 1 season as a Kansas Jayhawk.
2021 season
Gethro Muscadin was a 3/4 star recruit originally from Haiti who had spent time at Aspire Academy in Kentucky. He was 6’10 with a good athletic build and length. He came to the program for the 2020-21 season, expecting to be a longer-term project who could help the team with interior scoring, rebounding, and rim protection.
On the depth chart, Muscadin was behind David McCormack, Silvio De Sousa, and Mitch Lightfoot. Shortly before the beginning of the season, De Sousa left the team due to his off-court criminal charges. With only 2 true interior players remaining, there was some thought that Muscadin could get some playing time. This didn’t happen, as Kansas would end up playing a four guard/wing lineup around a single interior player (McCormack or Lightfoot).
Muscadin only scored 2 points during his 12 brief appearances wearing the Kansas Jayhawk jersey, which totaled 33 minutes. This lone basket was a dunk, and came late in the second half against Nebraska Omaha. It can be seen around the 15:25 mark of the following video:
In fact, the only shots, either on the floor or at the free throw line, that he took at Kansas were in this game. He played in 8 minutes and also had 4 rebounds. Muscadin did appear in both NCAA Tournament games, subbing in briefly during KU’s Round of 64 win against Eastern Washington and also grabbing a rebound in the late stages of KU’s Round of 32 blowout loss to USC.
Gethro’s advanced stats don’t add much given his limited playing time. Rebounding appeared to be his best attribute, particularly given his size and athleticism.
The next detail to consider is Muscadin’s value stats, which again are limited due to his scant court time.
Muscadin gave up value due to a limited offensive skill set, but his defense was quite acceptable. In total, a -0.49 points per game value score doesn’t look too bad. However, this is skewed due to limited minutes. If we take a per possession look, he was last among scholarship players that season at -9.68 points per 100 possessions. His WAR was -0.11, again constrained due to his limited number of minutes.
Post-Kansas career
Following the season, Muscadin transferred to New Mexico to play for the Lobos for 2021-22. He would play in 12 games, starting in 9, and score a career high of 18 against both Florida Atlantic and Montana St. His official and advanced stats from College Basketball Reference show improvements as he was able to find his way off the bench and onto the floor for a Mountain West Conference team in non-conference play against the 115th best non-con schedule. It was here where he best showed his basketball potential.
Gethro transferred from Kansas during an era where this has become far more prevalent. It wasn’t out of spite or bitterness. In fact, he never lost his love of the Jayhawks or affiliation with the program. Hours before his fateful car crash on I335 south of Topeka, he was watching his former teammates defeat Nevada at Allen Fieldhouse.
This tragic loss of life can best be addressed by the sentiments of Bill Self, which this blog shares. We will leave with coach’s words from a November 1, 2022 tweet.
Gethro Muscadin passed away late last night. He had been unresponsive since the car accident last December. Our thoughts and prayers go out to Gethro’s loved ones. So young. So sad. He will always be a teammate of ours. RIP.
There are 13 golfers who have won at least 6 career majors. The following tables compare and contrast these 13.
The top table looks at major victories; the bottom table looks at major Top 10’s. Each table is sorted by total victories/Top 10’s. Additionally, the highest finisher in each category (column) is highlighted. Jack Nicklaus leads in this category, as he has not only the most majors won but also the most of 3 of the 4 majors. This is likewise true for Top 10’s by major.
In addition to looking at total performances, winning and Top 10 percentages are included. This is because, specifically for prior eras, players had fewer opportunities to compete in all the majors. The Masters wasn’t formed until after Walter Hagen’s prime for instance. And Ben Hogan only played in the British Open once (winning).
In order to keep the percentages meaningful, only the events played before a player turned 50 count in the divisor. We want to ensure that percentages aren’t punishing a player who plays in majors as a legacy winner (The Masters and PGA allow lifetime exemptions for all past winners, the British allows winners to play until they turn 60). This means that each major a player plays at 50 or older can only help him. He can add to his numerator should he get a Top 10, or even win as was the case for then 50-year-old Phil Mickelson at the 2021 PGA.
When we look at the percentages, it better shows just how good Bobby Jones and Ben Hogan were in their primes, and how much better their major totals may have been had they played 4 majors a year like the modern crop of players do.